👀 You are watching:
Jump to content
👉 Click here to explore Remote Jobs, Work From Home & Global News – USA 🇺🇸 | UK 🇬🇧 | Canada 🇨🇦 | Pakistan 🇵🇰 ×
🚫 Guest Access Notice ×
  • entries
    183,520
  • comments
    31
  • views
    446,303

l_186220_092527_updates.jpg
186220_7176068_updates.jpg The Supreme Court had initiated contempt proceedings against Minister of State for Interior Affairs Tallal Chaudry on account of "derogatory and contemptuous speeches/statements" with regard to the court, according to a notification issued on February 2. Photo: Geo News file
 

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will indict Minister of State for Interior Affairs Tallal Chaudry in a contempt of court case today.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan had decided to frame charges against the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader during a hearing of the case, based on the court's notice, on March 8. 

Chaudry had been summoned in person for today's hearing. Appearing before the court, Chaudry pleaded the bench to hear his plea before framing charges.

Justice Ejaz remarked that the defendant can plead his case later as charges will be framed today. "We don?t want to waste more time," he remarked further. 

Chaudry's counsel argued that there are precedents of several court judgments when the bench has shown leniency in such cases. 

Justice Maqbool Baqar observed that the matter is not of dishonouring an individual but an institution.

The hearing was then briefly adjourned.

On February 24, the minister had requested the court to withdraw the case, stating that scandalising the court or doing anything that tends to bring the court into ?hatred, ridicule or contempt? is ?not even the last thing on the respondent?s mind.?

?Whatever has been said might have been taken into account without relevance to the context due to media reporting,? Chaudry had written in his initial response.

The apex court had initiated contempt proceedings against Chaudry on account of "derogatory and contemptuous speeches/statements" with regard to the court, according to a notification issued on February 2.


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...