👀 You are watching:
Jump to content
👉 Click here to explore Remote Jobs, Work From Home & Global News – USA 🇺🇸 | UK 🇬🇧 | Canada 🇨🇦 | Pakistan 🇵🇰 ×
🚫 Guest Access Notice ×
  • entries
    182,863
  • comments
    31
  • views
    429,791

l_158225_022350_updates.jpg
158225_7308168_updates.jpg

LAHORE: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan said on Friday that for the first time justice has been delivered. 

He was referring to the dismissal of the review petitions filed by the Sharif family and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar against the Supreme Court's Panama Papers case verdict. 

Speaking to the media in Lahore, Imran said Nawaz Sharif tried his best to pressurise the Supreme Court with 'gimmicks' such as the former prime minister's 'GT Road Rally' after his disqualification. 

The PTI chief claimed Nawaz just wanted to remove the Supreme Court's monitoring judge [who will oversee corruption cases against the Sharifs and Dar in the accountability court] so "their own institutions could delay proceedings for years". 

"These people have used government institutions to protect them and harass others. You need controlled institutions to preserve corruption," he remarked.

Talking about the bailable warrants issued by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) against him, Imran said, "I ask the ECP, are you a court of law? Have you ever summoned anyone for contempt?" 

He lashed out at the ECP over its 'jurisdiction', saying this [ECP] is Asif Zardari and Nawaz?s ECP. "They are not neutral umpires," he said, adding that they will take this matter to the Supreme Court. 

"ECP is a weapon of the mafia. I ask them, why are you harassing us for the past several months only when you had all our party?s details for years," he argued.  

In response to a question, he lashed out at the appointment process of the National Accountability Bureau chairman, saying the prime minister and opposition leader, who jointly appoint the NAB chief, are themselves corrupt. 

He said the NAB chairman, as well as the ECP chairman and members, should be appointed by the Supreme Court. 


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...