Jump to content

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Welcome to our forums
Welcome to our forums, full of great ideas.
Please register if you'd like to take part of our project.
Urdu Poetry & History
Here you will get lot of urdu poetry and history sections and topics. Like/Comments and share with others.
We have random Poetry and specific Poet Poetry. Simply click at your favorite poet and get all his/her poetry.
Thank you buddy
Thank you for visiting our community.
If you need support you can post a private message to me or click below to create a topic so other people can also help you out.

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'files'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Help Support
    • Announcement And Help
    • Funday Chatroom
  • Poetry
    • Shair o Shairy
    • Famous Poet
  • Islam - اسلام
    • QURAN O TARJUMA قرآن و ترجمہ
    • AHADEES MUBARIK آحدیث مبارک
    • Ramazan ul Mubarik - رمضان المبارک
    • Deen O Duniya - دین و دنیا
  • Other Forums
    • Quizzes
    • Movies and Stars
    • Chit chat And Greetings
    • Urdu Adab
    • Entertainment
    • Common Rooms
  • Science, Arts & Culture
    • Education, Science & Technology
  • IPS Community Suite
    • IPS Community Suite 4.1
    • IPS Download
    • IPS Community Help/Support And Tutorials

Blogs

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • IPS Community Suite 4.4
    • Applications 4.4
    • Plugin 4.4
    • Themes/Ranks
    • IPS Languages 4.4
  • IPS Community Suite 4.3
    • Applications 4.3
    • Plugins 4.3
    • Themes 4.3
    • Language Packs 4.3
    • IPS Extras 4.3
  • IPS Community Suite 4
    • Applications
    • Plugins
    • Themes
    • Language Packs
    • IPS Extras
  • Books
    • Urdu Novels
    • Islamic
    • General Books
  • XenForo
    • Add-ons
    • Styles
    • Language Packs
    • Miscellaneous XML Files
  • Web Scripts
  • PC Softwares
  • Extras

Categories

  • Islamic
  • Funny Videos
  • Movies
  • Songs
  • Seasons
  • Online Channels

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Facebook ID


FB Page/Group URL


Bigo Live


Website URL


Instagram


Skype


Interests


Location


ZODIAC

Found 52 results

  1. If you haven't yet watched the trailers of Sunny Singh starrer Ujda Chaman and Ayushmann Khurrana's Bala, it's about time that you do. The clash between the two films, which are set to release around the same time next month, has now reached the courts. According to HT, Ujda Chaman's Producer Kumar Mangat Pathak has filed a court case against the makers of the Ayushmann Khurrana starrer Bala. The first hearing of the court case is said to be held on Thursday. The director of Ujda Chaman, Abhishek Pathak had earlier objected to Bala's trailer and the new release date, which was shifted to just a day before the release date of the Sunny Singh starrer. Ujda Chaman is a remake of the 2017 Kannada film Ondu Motteya Kathe, which revolves around the life of a young bald man. Ayushmann's Bala is also a film about a young man suffering from premature baldness and now, the audience has also caught similarities in the trailers of both movies. Pathak, while talking about the issue with Desi Martini said, “There are some similarities that can be seen between Bala and Ujda Chaman. I don't know what's happening. I came with my trailer on October 1 and they came out with it around 10-11 October. So, this question should be asked to them, how is it similar? If they had seen my trailer, they should have done something... at least, change something.” He also added that not only the idea but even the dialogues and screenplay of both the films are similar. “I know the original film so well and mine is an official remake. People don't know yet, because they are just seeing the trailer, but I know. I can see the glimpses of the original film in that trailer (Bala). So, I was like fine, let the legal team handle it,” the director added. He also said, “We had sent them a notice when we bought the rights, early 2019 because even their announcement had come around the same time. I gave them all the documents because their film sounded similar. They said except for the character being bald, nothing is similar and I bought their words. But now that doesn't seem to be the case. Dialogues, situation, everything seems similar and even people have caught it.” However, amid all the chaos, the lead actors of both movies, Sunny Singh and Ayushmann Khurrana, are absolutely unaffected by all the legal proceedings and apparent rivalry. Singh, in an interview, said that he is, in fact, a big fan of Ayushmann and his work and that despite the tension, it really does not matter much to him because both of them are actors doing their jobs. Ujda Chaman is set to release on 8th November whereas Bala will release on 7th November.
  2. Version 1.00

    3 downloads

    Latest forum ranks. 25+ folders and files including PNG images and PSD files.
  3. Rakhi Sawant (on the internet) is a gift that keeps on giving. I don't think any single person has given us so much entertainment than her. From interesting Instagram posts to all the outrageous comments she makes, there's never a non-controversial day in Rakhi's life. And now, as if her ongoing antics weren't enough, she has gone and filed a defamation case against Tanushree Dutta. But no, that's not even the best – or worst – part; she has filed a case for 25 paise. Yes, for real. "Maine #TanushreeDutta pe 25 paise ka case Kia hai KYU KI...": #RakhiSawant pic.twitter.com/750uFEjOYm — Bollywood Hungama (@Bollyhungama) October 31, 2018 What weird alternative timeline are we all living in right now? I know this isn't the right one for sure. She claimed that she wanted to file the case for â¹50 crore but settled on 25 paise because she didn't want to bother Tanushree's parents. She also talked about how Tanushree has abused her and claimed her supporters and even threatened her and how this defamation case is all about showing Tanushree her 'aukaat'. In the video, she also cleared the air about the fact that even though Tanushree had claimed that she has filed a case against Rakhi for â¹10 crore, she hasn't gotten any legal notice. Everyone should learn from Rakhi how to fit as many wrong and controversial comments in a short amount of time because wow, today's video was totally jam-packed. Along with talking about the case, she also trashed the biggest movement in the country right now – the #MeToo movement. Claiming that #MeToo is 'gandagi of the West', she defended Alok Nath and Anu Malik. Rakhi, honestly, just stop, please? Pretty please? In case you were living under a rock, the whole Rakhi-Tanushree saga began last week when Rakhi called a press conference to make the claim that Tanushree is a lesbian and how she raped her. “Woh LESBIAN hai aur usne mera RAPE kia: “ #RakhiSawant 's SHOCKING claims about #TanushreeDutta pic.twitter.com/qWrUOHPDqn — Bollywood Hungama (@Bollyhungama) October 24, 2018 So much controversy, what is even happening? Rakhi, are you okay?
  4. Version 1.0.1

    2 downloads

    This plugin (hook) will add a new block on Downloads portal, below Most Downloaded files, to list the latest updated files. Requirement For Latest Updated Files: Downloads application
  5. Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif speaks during a UK PMLN Party Workers Convention meeting with supporters in London on July 11, 2018. Photo: AFP ISLAMABAD: Ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif has challenged the rejection of a petition to transfer...
  6. Ahad Cheema pictured on April 3, 2018, while being produced in the court. Photo: Geo News screen grab1LAHORE: The Lahore wing of NAB filed a reference against former Lahore Development Authority (LDA) director general Ahad Cheema in Ashiana...
  7. LAHORE: Renowned singer Ali Zafar has submitted on Saturday a defamation suit to a district court against fellow singer Meesha Shafi, who had accused Zafar of sexual harassment through a Twitter post. The suit, claiming damages of Rs1 billion, has...
  8. Ayesha Ahad ? the woman who claims to be married to Hamza Shehbaz, the son of the former chief minister of Punjab Shehbaz Sharif? registered a complaint against Hamza (left) and his brother-in-law Ali Imran (right).2LAHORE: Ayesha Ahad ? the...
  9. Pakistani singer Humaira Arshad. Photo: FacebookLAHORE: Popular Pakistani singer Humaira Arshad has once again filed for khula from her husband, actor Ahmad Butt.The singer approached a family court in Lahore on Wednesday to file a petition to...
  10. The firm became embroiled in scandal in March when former analyst, 28-year-old Canadian Christopher Wylie, revealed it had used a Facebook personality prediction app to hijack up to 87 million Facebook users´ data-AFPNEW YORK: British political...
  11. Suspended SSP Rao Anwar. Photo: FileKARACHI: Suspended SSP Rao Anwar has filed his bail petition, stating that geo-fencing and joint investigation reports and charge-sheet have contradictory information. The anti-terrorism court has therefore...
  12. Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (PIB faction) leader Dr Farooq Sattar submitted on Wednesday petitions seeking disqualification of 12 lawmakers who defected from the party. Photo: fileKARACHI: Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (PIB faction)...
  13. Version 1.1.0

    2 downloads

    This pluign will add a slider on file view to display other files from the file submitter. Settings: Number of files to display Type of files display: start date or random files Requirement: Downloads
  14. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during a meeting at the Ministry of Defence in Tel Aviv, Israel, April 29, 2018. Thomas Coex/Pool via Reuters WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Mike...
  15. Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a news conference at the Ministry of Defence in Tel Aviv, Israel, April 30, 2018. REUTERS/Amir Cohen TEL AVIV: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stepped up pressure on the United...
  16. Disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein. Image via REUTERS Video/Screenshot NEW YORK: US film and TV studio The Weinstein Company, whose ex-chairman Harvey Weinstein has been accused of sexual harassment and assault, said Monday it had filed for bankruptcy with an offer from with an affiliate of private equity firm Lantern Capital Partners to acquire its assets. The studio?s bankruptcy comes after it spent months looking for a buyer or investor. The company inked a deal with an investor group led by former Obama administration official Maria Contreras-Sweet but the group terminated its offer earlier this month after seeing that the company had more liabilities than previously disclosed. Weinstein Co said in a statement it entered into a ?stalking horse? agreement with a Lantern Capital affiliate that would purchase substantially all of the assets of the company. More than 70 women accused the company?s co-founder, Harvey Weinstein, who was one of Hollywood?s most influential men, of sexual misconduct, including rape. Weinstein has denied having non-consensual *** with anyone. Movie producer Killer Content also said bankruptcy would be the best option for the company and that it may be interested in the studio?s assets in a bankruptcy auction. In February, New York Attorney-General Eric Schneiderman sued the Weinstein Company, Harvey Weinstein, and his brother Bob Weinstein, alleging that Harvey Weinstein sexually harassed employees and the company failed to respond. Bob Weinstein co-founded the company and is the co-chairman. Launched in October 2005, the studio produced and distributed critically acclaimed hits including The King?s Speech and Silver Linings Playbook, as well as TV series such as long-running fashion reality competition Project Runway.
  17. Vanessa Trump, a former model and actress, and Trump Jr said in a joint statement on Thursday: ?After 12 years of marriage, we have decided to go our separate ways. WASHINGTON/NEW YORK: The wife of Donald Trump Jr, the eldest son of US President Donald Trump, has filed for divorce in New York, according to court records. Vanessa Trump, a former model and actress, and Trump Jr said in a joint statement on Thursday: ?After 12 years of marriage, we have decided to go our separate ways.? The statement was provided by the Trump Organization, the president?s business empire, which his son helps manage. Further details were not immediately available on the uncontested divorce filing by Vanessa Trump in a New York state court. She and Trump Jr have ?enormous respect? for each other, according to the joint statement, which also asked for privacy. The couple were married in 2005 and have five children. In recent months, Trump Jr, 40, has become enmeshed in an investigation of possible collusion between his father?s presidential campaign and Russia in the 2016 presidential election. The president has denied any such collusion. Trump Jr arranged a 2016 meeting between a group of Russians and members of his father?s campaign after an intermediary said the Russians offered damaging information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. ?I love it,? Trump Jr responded to the intermediary in an email. He has played a key role in the Trump Organisation since his father entered the White House in January 2017. The president said he would maintain ownership in his hotels, golf courses and hundreds of other businesses but hand off control to his two oldest sons. The Trump Organisation?s website describes Trump Jr as an executive vice president, like his brother Eric Trump. Last month, Vanessa Trump was taken to a New York hospital after she opened a piece of mail containing a threat and a white powder that was later determined to be non-hazardous. Federal prosecutors in Boston earlier this month charged a Massachusetts man with sending the threatening letter.
  18. Former finance minister Senator Ishaq Dar. Photo: Geo News file ISLAMABAD: A National Accountability Bureau (NAB) prosecutor on Monday filed a supplementary reference against former finance minister Senator Ishaq Dar in a corruption reference against him. Dar, a close aide of Pakistan Muslim League-N chief Nawaz Sharif, is accused of possessing assets disproportionate to his declared sources of income. A reference against him was filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in light of the Supreme Court's July 28 verdict in the Panama Papers case. NAB's Special Prosecutor Imran Shafeeq and NAB's Investigation Officer (IO) submitted the supplementary reference to the Registrar's Office, which, according to sources includes additional witnesses and three new accused persons. 'Pakistan is my country, will return to it' Dar on Saturday had said that he will return to Pakistan after his medical treatment concludes. The Senator was visiting Begum Kulsoom Nawaz ? who is undergoing cancer treatment in London since August last year ? to inquire about her health. "Pakistan is my country and I will definitely return to it," he had said. He said that he was presently receiving medical treatment in London and would return back as soon as his doctors give the go ahead.
  19. The Dropbox app logo is seen on a mobile phone, October 16, 2017. REUTERS/Thomas White/Illustration Data-sharing business Dropbox Inc on Friday filed for an initial public offering of up to $500 million with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The San Francisco-based company, which started as a free service to share and store photos, music and other large files, competes with much larger technology firms such as Alphabet Inc?s Google, Microsoft Corp, and Amazon.com Inc as well as cloud-storage rival Box Inc. It plans to have its common stock listed on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "DBX." In its regulatory filing, Dropbox reported 2017 revenue of $1.11 billion, up 31 percent from $844.8 million a year earlier. The company?s net loss narrowed to $111.7 million in 2017 from $210.2 million in 2016. ?With over a $1 billion in revenues it speaks to Dropbox?s success over the past few years and is an impressive number in a fertile space,? said Daniel Ives at research firm GBH Insights. ?Dropbox?s business model has scaled successfully.? The company?s biggest challenge is explaining to Wall Street what differentiates Dropbox from its many competitors, Box Chief Executive Aaron Levie told Reuters on Friday. ?If Dropbox continues to focus on their user experience, they?ll be able to compete successfully for consumers and professionals,? Levie said. Dropbox, which has 11 million paying users across 180 countries, said that about half of its 2017 revenue came from customers outside the United States. Goldman Sachs & Co, JPMorgan, and Deutsche Bank Securities are some of the leading underwriters for the IPO. The amount of money a company says it plans to raise in its first IPO filing is usually a temporary placeholder.
  20. MQM-P PIB faction head Farooq Sattar (left) and MQM-P Bahadurabad group's member Amir Khan (right). Photo: Geo News ISLAMABAD: A delegation of the Muttahida Quami Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) Bahadurabad faction filed a complaint against the recently conducted intra-party elections by the Farooq Sattar-led splinter group (PIB faction) with the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) here on Tuesday. The complaint, filed by Farogh Naseem, demands the intra-party elections to be declared void. A notice to appear before the ECP on February 27 was issued to the party's PIB faction after the filing of the complaint. Sattar elected as convener in intra-party elections MQM-P's PIB faction on Sunday elected Dr Farooq Sattar as its convener. Sattar, who was deposed by the Rabita Committee Sattar on February 11, secured 9,433 votes in the intra-party polls held in Karachi and Hyderabad. The Bahadurabad group, however, termed the elections illegal and alleged that they were a 'condemnable effort to divide loyal party workers.' MQM-P's PIB faction elects Farooq Sattar as convener Newly elected Rabita Committee to appoint deputy conveners today "The Rabita Committee, alone, can make policy decisions," a statement issued by the splinter group had said. Speaking to workers at KMC Ground, Sattar had said the elections were not just polls but a referendum. "A decision has been made that Rabita Committee and [party] constitution exist as long as there are workers too, and if there is no worker, then there's no Rabita Committee." Sattar had said that Sunday's referendum will put an end to a feudal, authoritarian mindset in the party. Infighting between MQM-P leaders The infighting between MQM-P's two factions ? Sattar-led PIB and Rabita Committee-led Bahadurabad ? started over the issue of distribution of party tickets for next month's Senate elections. The latter had strongly opposed Sattar's nomination of the relative newcomer Kamran Tessori over seasoned party leaders. Sattar, on February 11, had announced the decision to dissolve the party's Rabita Committee during a general workers' meeting, hours after members of the coordination committee at the party's Bahadurabad office said he was no longer the convener of the party.
  21. The Avenfield reference pertains to the Sharif family's properties in London. Photo: File ISLAMABAD: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) filed in the accountability court on Monday a supplementary reference against former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and four others in the Avenfield properties case. Nawaz and his family face three references pertaining to the Azizia Steel Mills and Hill Metals Establishment, their London (Avenfield) properties, and over a dozen offshore companies, including Flagship Investment Ltd. Witnesses record statements in corruption cases against Nawaz, family This was Nawaz's 13th appearance before the court, which has been conducting proceedings of three NAB references against the Sharif family NAB informed the judge that the new supplementary reference which has fresh pieces of evidence against the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader includes seven new prosecution witnesses, including two from the United Kingdom. Forensic expert Robert Radley and a close relative of Panama case Joint Investigative Team head, Federal Investigation Agency Additional Director Wajid Zia, will be the witnesses in the case, while two other witnesses are affiliated with the Ministry of Information. NAB informed that it has taken the initial statement from the witnesses based in the UK. The apex anti-corruption watchdog said that one of the witnesses belongs to a private media channel, while two others work under NAB. NAB withdraws plea against change in Maryam, Safdar's indictment NAB had appealed accountability court's removal of charges of submitting false documents from Maryam and Safdar's indictment in Avenfield reference Moreover, it also informed the court that excerpts of TV interviews of Nawaz, Maryam, Hasan and Hussain are part of the evidence. The Avenfield reference pertains to the Park Lane apartments of the Sharif family and includes Nawaz, his three children, and son-in-law MNA Capt (retd) Safdar as accused. Hasan and Hussain have been declared proclaimed offenders for not being a part of the proceedings.
  22. PTI leader Jahangir Tareen. Photo: File ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Jahangir Tareen filed on Friday an appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan against his disqualification from Parliament. A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar, had disqualified Tareen on December 15 in its decision on a petition filed against Tareen and PTI Chairman Imran Khan. Clearing Imran, the court had declared Tareen dishonest under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution, stating that the PTI leader used suspicious terms in his statements to the court, besides not declaring his offshore company. Post SC disqualification, Jahangir Tareen resigns as PTI's secretary general High-level PTI meeting at Bani Gala today to decide party's future course of action Following his disqualification, Tareen had claimed that he was disqualified over the interpretation of a legal term. In his review petition, Tareen states that he did not intentionally conceal his assets in the nomination papers he filed for the Lodhran by-election in 2015. Tareen's disqualification The apex court, in its Dec judgment, declared that Tareen had failed to declare in his nomination papers the Hyde House property or SVL, the off-shore company established for the property. The apex court verdict said that Tareen was infact "the actual, true, real and beneficial owner of the said property". "SVL or Hyde House was never transferred to any trust by the respondent, thus, it is his asset which he has failed to declare in his nomination papers filed on 9.9.2015 according to the mandate of the law to contest the by-elections from NA-154 Lodhran and, therefore, he is not honest in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution read with Section 99(1)(f) of ROPA," read the Supreme Court's order. Article 62(1)(f) reads: "A person shall not be qualified to be elected or chosen as a member of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) unless-...he is sagacious, righteous and non-profligate, honest and ameen, there being no declaration to the contrary by a court of law." Imran Khan cleared, Jahangir Tareen disqualified by Supreme Court ECP denotifies Tareen from his constituency of NA-154 Lodhran-1 The apex court added that Tareen had made "a blatant misstatement...before the highest judicial forum of the country", claiming he had "no beneficial interest in the trust arrangement which holds the SVL and the Hyde House" while he was infact a ?discretionary lifetime beneficiary? along with his spouse. Therefore, he is declared "not to be an honest person in terms of the constitutional provisions and the provisions of ROPA". "In his concise statement the respondent [Tareen] in unequivocal, clear and unambiguous terms stated that he has no beneficial interest in the trust arrangement which holds the SVL and the Hyde House, however from the trust deed dated 5.5.2011, on which reliance has been placed by the respondent himself, he is the ?discretionary lifetime beneficiary? along with his spouse and, therefore, this is a blatant misstatement on the part of the respondent made before the highest judicial forum of the country which is not a trait of an honest person. Consequently, on both the counts mentioned above, the respondent is declared not to be an honest person in terms of the constitutional provisions and the provisions of ROPA, therefore, he ceases to be the member of the Parliament having incurred the disqualification," the apex court bench wrote in its judgment. The judgment further stated that the PTI secretary general had pleaded guilty to insider trading. Moreover, the court ruled that Tareen used suspicious terms in his statements to the court. It was also stated in the judgment that the court is not announcing its decision on Tareen's agriculture land matter.
  23. You might recall that only recently The Tribune exposed a UIDAI security breach that allowed anyone and everyone who has 10 minutes and a mere Rs. 500 at their disposal, to get access to the Aadhaar details of 1 billion Indians. This news obviously didn't go down well with the citizens of the country and what followed was widespread outrage. That very day, UIDAI went ahead and took to their social media accounts and outright declared The Tribune's story a case of misreporting. Tribune's Story “Rs 500, 10 minutes, and you have access to billion Aadhaar details” is a case of misreporting. No biometric data breach @thetribunechd @rsprasad @ceo_uidai @timesofindia @firstpost @IndiaToday @ZeeNews — Aadhaar (@UIDAI) January 4, 2018 The nation was waiting for a clear explanation from UIDAI about this fiasco while their website went down for a while. But what has now happened has stirred the country once again. UIDAI has now filed an FIR against The Tribune and its reporter Rachna Khaira. The FIR also names Anil Kumar, Sunil Kumar and Raj, all of whom were mentioned in The Tribune report as people who were contacted by Khaira in the course of her reporting. Harish Khare, the Editor-in-chief of The Tribune commented on the whole matter through the Twitter handle of the newspaper. The #Tribune Editor-in-Chief's statement on #Aadhaar #FIR pic.twitter.com/Mjmr5HK8Mb — The Tribune (@thetribunechd) January 7, 2018 What followed this news was eminent journalists raging with anger. While some condemn the act, others call it an attack on freedom of expression. Hey @UIDAI, Can you please file an FIR against yourself for gross negligence and endangering citizens? Since you are the only one who is allowed to file FIRs, please do it. A thorough investigation of UIDAI needs to be initiated. Thanks. — Meghnad (@Memeghnad) January 7, 2018 Totally wrong for UIDAI to file an FIR against the journalist who exposed #AadharLeaks If a loophole is pointed out Govt should work on fixing the flaw rather than try to shoot the messenger. Don't intimidate journalists. Not on. https://t.co/6mxDrZlrLC — Rahul Kanwal (@rahulkanwal) January 7, 2018 Instead of thanking Tribune reporter who exposed gap in Aadhaar security -- biometrics safe but y should email/phone/address be available? --so it can be plugged @uidai files FIR against reporter!Bad idea @ceo_uidai Had it not been for report,Uidai wouldn't even know about breach pic.twitter.com/iCdwvyFoIB — Sunil Jain (@thesuniljain) January 7, 2018 Ditto. Refute disagreements. If you think Tribune story defamatory or inaccurate argue it- on fact- but whats with the FIR against a reporter doing her job? https://t.co/yVUC2NSRZo — barkha dutt (@BDUTT) January 7, 2018 Dear @UIDAI: Reporter who showed that Aadhaar numbers are for sale deserves award, not FIR. https://t.co/bI8L73xrXC pic.twitter.com/iBxGByZl2I — Sadanand Dhume (@dhume) January 7, 2018 Tribune reporter blew the whistle on Aadhaar showing how easy it is to steal personal info from Aadhaar database.Instead of rewarding her as a whistleblower,the govt has registered an FIR against her!This is why Modi govt has not notified Whistleblower lawhttps://t.co/0szECv3dLD — Prashant Bhushan (@pbhushan1) January 7, 2018 We should condemn the move by #UIDAI to file FIR against The Tribune newspaper and journalist @rachnakhaira for brave reportage exposing loopholes in #Aadhar and how easily for Rs. 500 an agent can share private information within 10 minutes. Shooting the messenger won't help. — Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul) January 7, 2018 Filing FIR against reporter for exposing Aadhar breach, suing journalists for fact-based stories, calling them names are all part of the same trend: the msg to journos is, don't ask questions, become chamchas. Well, some will never do that — Sidharth Bhatia (@bombaywallah) January 7, 2018 Withdraw the FIR against @thetribunechd reporter, UIDAI. You can refute what you find unfair or wrong. But throwing cops at reporters is, as stupid as it is unsustainable https://t.co/o3vNtqFUsq — Shekhar Gupta (@ShekharGupta) January 7, 2018 Even the Editors Guild came out in support of The Tribune. After seeing this outrage, UIDAI again took to Twitter to declare that they do not intend to 'target' the media. However, they did make it clear that they still firmly by their decision of filing the FIR. In the recent case of The Tribune's report in which an FIR is filed, an impression is being created in media that UIDAI is targeting the media or whistleblowers or “shooting the messenger”. This is not at all true. 1/n@timesofindia @DeccanHerald @DeccanChronicle @IndianExpress — Aadhaar (@UIDAI) January 7, 2018 This is a case in which even though there was no breach of Aadhaar biometric database, it is for the act of unauthorized access, criminal proceedings have been initiated. 2/n @htTweets @FinancialXpress @TheQuint @EconomicTimes @ndtv @aajtak @CNBCTV18News — Aadhaar (@UIDAI) January 7, 2018 We respect Free Speech including the Freedom of Press and Media. However, our act of filing an FIR with full details of the incident should not be viewed as targeting the media or the whistle-blowers or “shooting the messenger. 3/n@ETNOWlive @abpnewstv @TimesNow — Aadhaar (@UIDAI) January 7, 2018 They also asked for The Tribune to cooperate and for their suggestions in this matter. UIDAI is committed to the freedom of Press. We're going to write to @thetribunechd & @rachnakhaira to give all assistance to investigate to nab the real culprits. We also appreciate if Tribune & its journalist have any constructive suggestion to offer. https://t.co/H3OtQSiFeJ — Aadhaar (@UIDAI) January 8, 2018 We don't know in which direction this matter would go in now, but we fear that it already has taken an ugly turn.
  24. If you were handpicked as one of the few buyers for a rare supercar, you would obviously want to hold on to it, right? But, John Cena is not like everyone, and doesn't care about that, apparently. Ford had personally chosen buyers for the $450,000-plus Ford GT supercar, and John Cena was one of the few lucky people who managed to get their hands on this super exclusive supercar. © Ford But, he didn't waste any time and soon sold this car for cash, and has ended up with legal troubles now. But, really though, he's a millionaire, why did he need cash so bad that he breached his contract. Moreover, if he had waited to sell the car, he would have made a hell lot of money because one, it's a rare supercar and their value just increases over time, and second, who wouldn't to buy John Cena's car if they can afford it. And then, Ford got wind of Cena flipping the car before he was legally allowed to, and has decided to sue him. Apparently, the 40-year old star was bound by a contract that specified that is supposed to hold on to the car for at least 2 years. The lawsuit, which has been filed in U.S. District Court in Michigan, reportedly says John got a massive profit from the sale. “Mr Cena has unfairly made a large profit from the unauthorised resale flip of the vehicle, and Ford has suffered additional damages and losses, including, but not limited to, loss of brand value, ambassador activity, and customer goodwill due to the improper sale.” Okay, but honestly, if John Cena didn't say “You can't sue me!” at least once when he got the news, that would be the biggest disappointment of this highly disappointing year. Even though he is worth millions of dollars, he, apparently, sold the car and some property just to pay bills. And, if is actually in a financial crunch, this whole thing has probably backfired on him, as Ford now wants all the proceeds from the sale as well as damages. He was interested in buying the car, but it wasn't like Ford just handed it over to him because he's famous. Those who were interested in purchasing had to apply for it, with more than 7,000 doing so. Those who were selected for the ultimate prize includes artist Deadau5, actor Scott Eastwood, American NASCAR driver Joey Logano, baseballer C. J. Wilson and YouTuber Shmee150. He also appeared in a YouTube video on the Bella Twins' channel promoting the 2017 Ford GT, back in October. Even though he couldn't properly fit inside the car, he had nothing but praise for the car's carbon fibre materials and stunning aerodynamics. He also noted it's the most powerful V6 ever made. Throughout the video, he was so happy talking about the car, it's hard to understand why he sold it so suddenly.
  25. Dar's continuous absence from the accountability court hearing a corruption reference against him resulted on Tuesday in the initiation of the process to declare him a proclaimed offender ISLAMABAD: Ahmed Ali Quddusi, the bail guarantor of former finance minister Ishaq Dar, on Friday submitted his reply in the accountability court, praying that Dar?s bail not be seized. The court had issued a notice to Qudoosi, asking him to submit a written response on November 24 (today) on why Dar's surety bond of Rs5 million should not be confiscated. Quddusi also requested the court to provide Dar three more weeks to appear before the court as he is undergoing medical treatment in London. Dar's continuous absence from the accountability court hearing a corruption reference against him resulted on Tuesday in the initiation of the process to declare him a proclaimed offender. NAB court declares Ishaq Dar absconder, orders initiating 'proclaimed offender' proceedings Finance Minister Ishaq Dar is accused of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income Judge Mohammad Bashir dismissed the pleas from Dar's counsel to exempt his client from appearance and to appoint a legal representative on his behalf. The former finance minister is accused of possessing assets disproportionate to his declared sources of income.
×
×
  • Create New...